LANGUAGE, THOUGHT, AND REALITY: LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY IN THE MODERN WORLD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/2.6079Keywords:
linguistic relativity, language and thought, cognitive linguistics, multilingualism, cultural context, perception and categorization, social interaction, artificial intelligence, globalization, language and worldview.Abstract
The relationship between language and thought has long been a central concern in linguistics and cognitive science. This study explores the concept of linguistic relativity and its relevance in the modern, globalized, and technology-driven world. Drawing on qualitative analysis and interdisciplinary perspectives, the article examines how language influences perception, categorization, and social interaction. Particular attention is given to multilingualism, cultural context, and the role of artificial intelligence in shaping language use. The findings suggest that while language does not strictly determine thought, it significantly guides cognitive processes and worldview construction. The study highlights the importance of linguistic awareness in fostering cross-cultural understanding and responsible technological development.
Downloads
References
1. Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477
2. Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62–65.
3. Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
4. Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
5. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
6. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
7. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press.
8. Lucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291
9. Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking.
10. Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace & Company.
11. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
12. https://mentaljournal-jspu.uz/index.php/mesmj/article/view/1187
