CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION: DISTINGUISHING ANTITHESIS FROM ANTONYMY AND SIMPLE CONTRAST

Authors

  • Ashurova Gulirano Bakhor kizi 2nd year Master’s student, University of Economics and Pedagogy
  • Panjiyeva N.N Scientific supervisor:

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i4/2.5890

Keywords:

antithesis,, antonymy,, contrast,, rhetoric,, semantics,, juxtaposition,, opposition.

Abstract

This article can be annotated by highlighting examples of each concept, noting the parallel structures in antithesis, identifying word pairs exhibiting antonymy, and listing the points of difference in simple contrasts. The exploration of language and its nuances has long fascinated scholars across various disciplines, particularly in linguistics and rhetoric. Among the key concepts that have 
garnered attention are antithesis, antonymy, and simple contrast. These terms, while related to the idea of opposition, serve distinct functions in communication. Several notable scholars have contributed to our understanding of these concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics: Exploring the Nature of Antonymy, Complementarity, and Other Paradigmatic Semantic Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 197–222).

2. Cuddon, J. A. (2013). A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory: Comprehensive Definitions of Antithesis, Paradox, and Rhetorical Contrast. London: Wiley-Blackwell. (pp. 45–68).

3. Fahnestock, J. (1999). Rhetorical Figures in Science: The Function of Antithesis and Other Schemes in the Construction of Argument and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (pp. 82–105).

4. Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A Corpus-Based Perspective on the Usage and Function of Opposites in English Discourse. London: Routledge. (pp. 43–67).

5. Leech, G. N. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry: Investigating the Stylistic Functions of Antithesis and Semantic Deviation. London: Longman. (pp. 132–155).

6. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics: Volume 1 - An Investigation into Lexical Opposition, Binary Contrast, and Paradigmatic Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 270–295).

7. Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 169–190).

8. Wales, K. (2011). A Dictionary of Stylistics: Defining Rhetorical Schemes, Antithesis, and Contrast in Modern Literary Analysis. London: Routledge. (pp. 22–45).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION: DISTINGUISHING ANTITHESIS FROM ANTONYMY AND SIMPLE CONTRAST. (2026). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 4(4/2), 447-451. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i4/2.5890
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide