BICS & CALP REVISITED: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i4/1.5877Keywords:
BICS, CALP, CUP/CULP, Iceberg Model, Language Immersion Program, Threshold Hypothesis, Unitary Trait Hypothesis, IntelligenceAbstract
This paper makes an attempt to capture introductorily the notions of BICS (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) and CALP (Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency) introduced by Cummins. Assuming that BICS encompass rudimentary knowledge of speech and basic fluency, CALP, in contrast, evokes a high degree of cognition needed for academic subjects and tasks. In length, other
aspects of the Model termed CUP/CULP (Common Underlying Proficiency) as well as the Iceberg Model connected to the above notions are discussed. Later the paper compares the Model with Language Immersion Program to bear the Model out. Then by introducing the Threshold Hypothesis as well as the Unitary Trait Hypothesis, the study tries to relate these perspectives to the concepts of BICS and CALP.
Downloads
References
1. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroompractices. New York: Longman.
2. Cline, T. & Frederickson, N. (Eds.). (1996). Curriculum related assessment, Cummins and bilingual children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
3. Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language foracademic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21 (4), 617-642.
4. Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism,19, 121-129.
5. Cummins, J. (1981a). Age on arrival and immigrant second languagelearning in Canada: A reassessment. Applied Linguistics, 2, 132-149.
387 4 4/1
6. Cummins, J. (1981b). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and Language Minority Students:A Theoretical Framework(pp. 48-63). Los Angeles:
Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Centre of California State University.
7. Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18-36.
8. Cummins, J. (2000). Putting language proficiency in its place: Responding to critiques of the conversational/academic language distinction. In J. Cenoz, & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (PP.54-83). Clevedon: Multilingual matters
9. Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopediaof language and education (2nd ed.), (pp. 71-83). New York: Springer.
10. Cummins, J. and Swain, M. (1983) Analysis-by rhetoric: reading the text or the reader's own projections? A reply to Edelsky et al. Applied Linguistics, 4, 22-41.
11. Dorneyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2012). Teaching and researching motivation (2nded.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
12. Duff, P. A. (2005). ESL in secondary schools: Programs, problematics, and Possibilities. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in secondlanguage learning and teaching. New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Edelsky, C. (1990). With literacy and justice for all: Rethinking the social in language and education. London: The Falmer Press.
14. Edelsky, C, Hudelson, S., Altwerger, B., Flores, B., Barkin, F., &Jilbert, K.(1983).
15. Semilingualism and language deficit. Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 1-22.
16. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
18. Francis, N. (2005). Bilingual children’s writing: Self-correction andrevision of written narratives in Spanish and Nahuatl. Linguistics andEducation 16, 74–92.
19. Goldstein, L., & Liu, N. (1994). An Integrated approach to the designof an immersion program. TESOL QUARTERLY, 28 (4), 705-729.
20. Hawkins, M. R. (2005). ESL in elementary education. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching. New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Jones, G. M. (2001). Bilingual education and syllabus design: towards aworkable blueprint.
22. In D. R. Hall & A. Hewings (Eds.), Innovation inEnglish Language Teaching: A reader. London and New York: Macquarie University and The Open University.
23. Oller, J. W. (1983). Issues in language testing research. Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
24. Tavakoli, H. (2012). A dictionary of language acquisition: A comprehensive overview of key terms in first and second language acquisition. Tehram: Rahman Press.
25. Wiley, T. G. (1996).Literacy and language diversity in the United States. Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems. Washington, DC:111
