COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC TYPES OF COMPOUND SENTENCES WITH CAUSATIVE-CONSECUTIVE RELATIONS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Authors

  • Ashurova Muxayyoxon Sanjarbek qizi PhD student of Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages ORCID ID: 0009-0007-9353-1036

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5831

Keywords:

compound sentences, causative-consecutive relations, communicative-pragmatic types, conjunction positioning, sentence structure, translation challenges, word order, tense consistency, grammaticalization, cross-linguistic analysis.

Abstract

This study examines the compound sentences with causative‐consecutive relations in English and Uzbek, focusing on their communicative‐pragmatic types. Drawing on theories from contrastive and cognitive linguistics, the analysis compares the composite sentence systems of the two languages, with particular attention to the positioning and number of conjunctions, the use of tense, and the overall syntactic structure. While both languages share a common function in expressing cause and effect, marked differences are evident in the placement of conjunctions, reliance on inflection versus word order, and tense agreement across clauses. The findings underscore the challenges inherent in translating such structures between English and Uzbek and suggest implications for language instruction and further research in interlingual grammar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abdurakhmonov G‘. O‘zbek tili grammatikasi. O‘qituvchi, 1976. – 135 b.

2. Asqarova M. Hozirgi zamon o‘zbek tilida qo‘shma gaplar. Uzbekistan academy of sciences, 1969. – 131 b.

3. Blokh M.Y.A Theoretical Grammar of the English Language. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1983. – 388 p.

4. Buranov U. et al. English Grammar. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi, 1974. – 256 pp.

5. Hoshimov G. M. Lectures on the Theory of Modern English Grammar: Syntax. 4th ed., revised. Tashkent, 2014. – 180 p.

6. Hewings M. Advanced Grammar in Use: A Self-Study Reference and Practice Book for Advanced Learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. – 340 pp.

7. Буранов Дж. Сравнительная типология английского языка и тюркских языков. – М.: Высшая школа, 1983. – 268 с.

8. Иванова И. П., Бурлакова В. В., Почепцов Г. Г. Теоретическая грамматика современного английского языка. – М.: Высшая школа, 1981. – 285 с.

9. Качалова К. Н., Израилевич Е. Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка. – Ташкент: Туркистон, 2001. – 608 с.

10. Каушанская В. Л., Ковнер Р. Л. Грамматика английского языка. – Л.: Просвещение (Ленинградское отделение), 1973. – 319 с.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC TYPES OF COMPOUND SENTENCES WITH CAUSATIVE-CONSECUTIVE RELATIONS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. (2026). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 4(5/1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5831
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide