MODERN PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES TO TEACHING SEPSIS PREVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT FORMS OF TUBERCULOSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i4/2.5802Keywords:
Tuberculosis, Sepsis, medical education, sepsis prevention, clinical reasoning, problem-based learning, case-based learning, clinical simulation, competency-based education, interactive methods.Abstract
This article examines modern pedagogical approaches to teaching sepsis prevention in patients with Tuberculosis. The relevance of the topic is determined by the high risk of developing Sepsis in tuberculosis patients and the need to improve the quality of medical education. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating clinical knowledge with innovative teaching methods, including Case-Based Learning (CBL), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), clinical simulation, and algorithm-based approaches. The article analyzes the role of competency-based education in developing clinical reasoning, practical skills, and decision-making abilities among medical students. Special attention is given to teaching early detection of sepsis using clinical tools such as SOFA and qSOFA, as well as to the application of interactive and student-centered learning strategies. The results show that the use of modern pedagogical technologies significantly improves students’ competence, enhances knowledge retention, and increases their readiness to manage complex clinical situations. The study concludes that the integration of innovative educational approaches contributes to better prevention of sepsis and improves the overall quality of healthcare.
Downloads
References
1. Surviving Sepsis Campaign. (2021). Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Medicine, 47(11), 1181–1247.
2. Evans L., Rhodes A., Alhazzani W., et al. (2021). Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines 2021: Executive summary. Critical Care Medicine, 49(11), e1063–e1143.
3. Cook D. A., & Steinert Y.. (2021). Online learning for medical education: A systematic review. Medical Teacher, 43(1), 15–25.
4. McCoy L., et al. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual simulation in medical education: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Education, 6(2), e20974.
5. Cheng A., et al. (2020). Simulation-based education for healthcare professionals: A review of effectiveness. Simulation in Healthcare, 15(2), 94–102.
6. Durning S. J., et al. (2020). Case-based learning and clinical reasoning: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1084–1092.
7. Dolmans D. H., et al. (2020). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice. Medical Education, 54(1), 19–27.
8. Vincent J. L., et al. (2021). Sepsis definitions and clinical criteria: An update. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 9(4), 417–428.
9. Torres A., et al. (2021). Tuberculosis and sepsis: Clinical challenges and management. European Respiratory Journal, 58(3), 2004525
10. Kleinpell R., et al. (2020). Promoting early identification of sepsis in clinical practice. American Journal of Critical Care, 29(1), 13–21.
