O‘ZBEK VA INGLIZ MADANIYATIDA “SAXIYLIK/GENEROSITY” KONSEPTINING KOGNITIV-SEMANTIK MODELI: NAZARIY ASOSLAR VA MEZONLAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i3/2.5252Keywords:
kognitiv semantika, leksik-semantik maydon (yadro–periferiya), konseptual metafora, qiyosiy lingvistika, baholovchi semantika, antonimiya (qarama-qarshi qatorlar).Abstract
Ushbu maqola o‘zbek va ingliz madaniyatlarida “saxiylik/generosity” konseptini tadqiq etishning nazariy asoslarini tizimli ravishda yoritadi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi konseptni lingvomadaniy birlik sifatida tahlil qilishda qo‘llaniladigan yondashuvlar (kognitiv semantika, lingvomadaniyatshunoslik va konseptologiya) doirasida qiyosiy tadqiqot uchun tayanch mezonlarni aniqlash hamda “saxiylik” konseptining struktur modelini (yadro–periferiya) asoslashdan iborat. Metodologik asos sifatida ilmiy adabiyotlar sharhi, definitsion (lug‘aviy) tahlil, komponent tahlil, konseptual-metaforik tahlil va semantik maydon yondashuvi qo‘llandi; natijalarni aniqlashtirish uchun o‘zbek va ingliz tilidagi tanlangan badiiy hamda publitsistik matnlarda konseptning diskursiv namoyon bo‘lishi kuzatildi.
Downloads
References
1. Khujamurodova, F. R. qizi. (2024). The concept of generosity in English and Uzbek language. Лучшие интеллектуальные исследования, 22(2), 118–123. (web-journal.ru)
2. Khujamurodova, K. F. R. qizi. (2024). Generosity as a linguistic and cultural concept. International Conference on Linguistics, Literature and Translation (London), 5, 49–51. (top-conferences.us)
3. Khujamurodova, F. R. qizi. (2024). Theoretical studies on the concept of generosity. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 2(12), 712–715. (eprints.umsida.ac.id)
4. Ashurova, M. (2024). Linguacultural peculiarities of the concept “happiness” in English and Uzbek languages. Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I3Y2024N44 (scienceproblems.uz)
5. Mambetniyazova, A., Babaeva, G., Dauletbayeva, R., Paluanova, M., & Abishova, G. (2024). Linguistic and cultural analysis of the concept “politeness”. Semiotica, 2024(258), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2023-0141 (degruyterbrill.com)
6. Monteiro, R. (2026). Linguoculturological conceptualization of language, text, and meaning in English and Uzbek discourses. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(2), 1–4.
7. Amanova, B. K., & Mukhammedova, N. K. (2025). Unveiling thought and culture: The linguo-cognitive study of idiomatic compounds (on the example of English and Uzbek). Nauka i texnologiya v sovremennom mire, 4(34). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17894011
8. Rozmatova, M. (2025). “Sincerity” and “samimiylik”: A comparative linguocultural study in English and Uzbek discourses. American Journal of Philological Sciences. (theusajournals.com)
9. Hakimova, Z. T. (2025). Conceptual metaphors in sewing terminology: A comparative analysis of English and Uzbek languages. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(8), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue08-15 (theusajournals.com)
10. Kaxarova, M. M. (2026). On the concept and related terms. Scientific Journal of the Fergana State University, 31(6), 166. https://doi.org/10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss6/a166 (journal.fdu.uz)
11. Burieva, N. G. (2022). National and cultural specifics of the verbalization of the concept “personality” in English and Uzbek. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 04(108), 687–689. https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2022.04.108.81
12. Umarova, M. B. (2022). Semantic and linguocultural features of English and Uzbek proverbs with concept of friendship. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences, 2(6), 1136–1144.
13. Abdilkadimovna, K. N. (2021). Comparative and linguocultural analysis of the concept “gender” in Uzbek and English languages. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 3(6), 112–117. (theamericanjournals.com)
14. Zibin, A. (2025). Metaphor interpretation in Jordanian Arabic, Emirati Arabic and Classical Arabic: A comparison between human participants and AI tools. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. (Nature)
15. Yetman, C. C. (2025). Metaphor and metaphilosophy: Wittgenstein, MacDonald, and the value of conceptual metaphor theory. European Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.13038 (Wiley Online Library).
