SYNTACTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPONENTS OF COMPOUND WORDS

Authors

  • Holikulova Gulchexra Yorqulovna SamDChTI teacher of the Department of Uzbek Language, Journalism, and Computational Linguistics Gmail: gulchehraholiqulova335@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i2.5221

Keywords:

compound word, syntactic relation, component, subordination, coordination, semantic integrity, word formation, structural analysis, lexical integration

Abstract

This article examines the syntactic relationships between the components of compound words from both theoretical and practical perspectives. The structural models of compound formations, as well as the subordinative and coordinative relations between their components, are analyzed within contemporary linguistic frameworks. The study employs structural, distributive, and componential analysis methods to reveal the internal syntactic mechanisms underlying compound units. Special attention is given to distinguishing compound words from free word combinations by identifying criteria such as morphological cohesion and semantic integrity. The findings demonstrate that syntactic relations between compound components play a significant role in the dynamic development of the language system and contribute to the enrichment of the lexical-semantic structure. The research provides a methodological foundation for further studies in theoretical linguistics, word formation, and syntax.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bauer, L. (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Bauer, L. (2001). Compounding. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

4. Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. London: Macmillan.

6. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

7. Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

8. Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Compound processing: Evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–13.

9. Plag, I. (2003). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10. Scalise, S. (1984). Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

SYNTACTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPONENTS OF COMPOUND WORDS. (2026). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 4(2), 781-788. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i2.5221
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide