MOTIVATION, AGE, AND LINGUISTIC CHALLENGES IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: A COPARATIVE METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF TWO LEARNERS

Authors

  • Tilavoldiyeva Feruzaxon Azizxon qizi Uzbekistan State World Languages University Faculty of English Philology Department of Applied Aspects of the English Language Trainee Teacher Email: Feruza7005@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i1.4867

Keywords:

Second language acquisition, adult learners, motivation and investment, morphology and syntax, affective filter, teaching methodology

Abstract

This methodological article examines the second language acquisition (SLA) processes of two adult learners from Central Asia through a comparative qualitative case-study approach. The research focuses on how motivation, age, instructional background, and affective factors influence the development of linguistic competence, particularly in morphology and syntax. The learners, Lola and Almaz, demonstrate contrasting learning trajectories shaped by deductive and inductive learning strategies, investment, and sociocultural identity. Drawing on established SLA theories such as motivation and investment, affective filter hypothesis, and age-related cognitive factors, the study highlights strengths and weaknesses in learners’ grammatical accuracy and communicative confidence. The findings suggest that balanced instruction, supportive learning environments, and task-based methodologies significantly contribute to effective adult language learning. Pedagogical implications are provided for English language teachers working with adult learners in multilingual contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Brown, H. D. (1991). TESOL at Twenty-Five: What are the Issues? TESOL Quarterly, 25(2).

2. Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). TESOL at Forty: What Are the Issues? Tesol Quarterly, 40(1).

3. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35

4. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2021). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching, 1–12.

5. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman Group UK Ltd.

6. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake. SSLA, 37–66.

7. Munoz, C. (2010). On how age affects foreign language learning. Advancesin Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching: Selected Papers, Gala, UniversityofBarcelona.Retrievedfromhttp://www.enl.auth.gr/gala/14th/Papers/Invited%20Speakers/Munoz.pdf

8. Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 137–174.

9. Singleton, D., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2018). L2 acquisition in childhood, adulthood and old age. Journal of Second Language Studies.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

MOTIVATION, AGE, AND LINGUISTIC CHALLENGES IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: A COPARATIVE METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF TWO LEARNERS. (2026). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 4(1), 434-439. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i1.4867
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide