O‘ZBEK EFL UNIVERSITET TALABALARI ORASIDA AKADEMIK YOZMA NUTQ ANIQLIGINI RIVOJLANTIRISHDA TENGDOSHLAR FIKR-MULOHAZASINING TA’SIRI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i1.4826Keywords:
Akademik yozuv; Oʻzaro fikr-mulohaza; Yozuv aniqligi; EFL oʻrganuvchilar; Oʻzbek universitet talabalari; Hamkorlikda oʻrganishAbstract
Ushbu tadqiqotda Oʻzbekistondagi EFL (ingliz tilini chet tili sifatida oʻrganuvchi) universitet talabalari akademik yozuvida oʻzaro baholash (peer review) ning aniqlikka ta’siri oʻrganildi. Kvazi-eksperimental tadqiqot dizayni asosida talabalar akademik insholaridagi grammatik, leksik va strukturaviy aniqlik koʻrsatkichlari peer feedback aralashuvi oldidan va undan keyin baholandi. Olingan natijalar hamkorlikda yozish texnikalari Oʻzbekiston oliy ta’lim tizimi sharoitida akademik yozuv sifatini oshirishga xizmat qilishini yoritib beradi.
Downloads
References
1. Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
2. Rakhimova, M. (2025). Academic writing challenges of Uzbek EFL university students. Eurasian Journal of Language and Education, 7(1), 22–35.
3. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
4. Iswandari, Y. A., & Jiang, L. (2025). Trends and patterns in peer feedback research in EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 45–68.
5. Wen, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Engagement with peer feedback in second language writing. System, 92, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
6. Ahmad, S., Mahmood, A., & Khan, R. (2025). Peer feedback and writing proficiency in EFL contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101–118.
7. Rustamova, N. (2025). Error patterns in academic writing among Uzbek EFL learners. Central Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 55–70.
8. Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
9. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
10. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
11. Chen, Y., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. (2024). Students’ engagement with peer feedback and its impact on second language writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 100989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.100989
12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
13. Lee, S. Y., & Krashen, S. (2002). Predictors of success in writing in English as a foreign language. The Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 1–18.
