COGNITIVE STRATEGIES FOR VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i1.4726Keywords:
cognitive strategies, vocabulary acquisition, foreign language learning, university students, vocabulary learning strategiesAbstract
This study investigates the role of cognitive strategies in foreign language vocabulary acquisition at the university level. Grounded in cognitive learning theory and the depth of processing framework, the research examines how different cognitive strategies - such as repetition, contextual usage, inferencing, imagery, and semantic mapping - affect students’ vocabulary learning outcomes. A mixed-method research design was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to ensure comprehensive analysis and data triangulation. The participants were 65 first-year university students with similar English proficiency levels. Data were collected through a vocabulary learning strategies questionnaire, a vocabulary knowledge test, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings revealed a significant positive correlation between the frequency of cognitive strategy use and vocabulary achievement. Qualitative analysis further indicated that high-achieving students employed a wider range of elaborative strategies, while low-achieving students relied mainly on mechanical repetition and translation. The findings highlight the necessity of explicit instruction in cognitive vocabulary learning strategies and suggest integrating systematic strategy training into university-level EFL and ESP curricula to enhance vocabulary retention and learner autonomy.
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed., pp. 45–47). W. H. Freeman.
2. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
3. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01355.x
4. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.24–26, 67–69, 217–219
5. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. 44
6. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Pearson. 85–95,
7. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge University Press.
8. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press. 65–67, 136 -166.
9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. 161-163, 215–218
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 86-88.
11. Tadjibaeva, A. (2024). The phonostylistics of english speech: classification and characteristics. Western European Journal of Linguistics and Education. 2(6). 197-204.
12. Таджибаева, А. (2024). Оптимизация развития словарного запаса в процессе обучения иностранному языку. Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика. 2(1.S). 70-78
13. Таджибаева, А. Э. (2023). Классификация имен существительных со значением лиц: семантический анализ. PERIODICA Journal of Modern Philosophy, Social Sciences and Humanities. 18(18). 131-136. https.//periodica.com.
14. Maxkamova, D. (2025). The role of smart technologies in linguistics. Shokh Articles Library, 1(1).
15. Хамракулова, С., & Махкамова, Д. (2025). Linguo-pragmatic features of idioms with age-related semantics in english. Международный мультидисциплинарный журнал исследований и разработок, 1(4), 41-44.
16. Toshpo‘latova M. I, Jurаyevа M, & Nabijonova N.M. (2024). Linguistic and cognitive theories, communication research, cognitive neuropsychology. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 4(03), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue03-24
17. Melikuziev, A. (2024). Paralinguistic Features as Crucial Indicators of Intent and Emotion in Communication. Engineering problems and innovations, 2(Spec. 1).
18. Meliqo'ziyev, A. (2024). The Role of Paralinguistics in Enhancing Communication Effectiveness. Engineering problems and innovations, 2(Spec. 1).
