IMPROVING THE APPLICATION OF MODERN PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING UROLITHIASIS

(ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DISCIPLINE “UROLOGY”)

Authors

  • Soliev Muzaffarjon Bakhtiyorjon o‘g‘li Independent Researcher at Andijan State Medical Institute E-mail: soliyevmuzaffar@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0003-1022-2615

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v3i5.4667

Keywords:

Urolithiasis, urology education, modern pedagogical technologies, medical teaching, interactive learning.

Abstract

Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases encountered in urological practice and represents an essential topic in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Effective teaching of this condition requires not only strong clinical content but also the use of modern pedagogical technologies to enhance students’ learning outcomes. This article aims to analyze and improve the application of contemporary pedagogical technologies in teaching urolithiasis within the discipline of urology. The study highlights the effectiveness of interactive methods, digital learning tools, simulation-based training, and problem-based learning in improving students’ clinical reasoning, engagement, and practical skills. The integration of modern educational technologies contributes to higher academic achievement and better preparedness for clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160–165.

2. Türk C, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–482.

3. Smith AD, Badlani GH, Bagley DH. Smith’s Textbook of Endourology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2019.

4. Harden RM. The lecture as an educational tool. Med Teach. 2000;22:334–338.

5. Bligh DA. What’s the Use of Lectures? Jossey-Bass; 2000.

6. Pearle MS, et al. Medical management of kidney stones. J Urol. 2014;192:316–324.

7. Frank JR, et al. Competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32:638–645.

8. Prince M. Does active learning work? J Eng Educ. 2004;93:223–231.

9. Thistlethwaite JE, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning. Med Teach. 2012;34:e421–e444.

10. Cook DA, et al. Technology-enhanced learning in medical education. JAMA. 2011;306:978–988.

11. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training. Lancet. 2003;362:1380–1381.

12. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. EAU; 2023.

13. Freeman S, et al. Active learning increases student performance. PNAS. 2014;111:8410–8415.

14. Dent JA, Harden RM. A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. Elsevier; 2017.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

IMPROVING THE APPLICATION OF MODERN PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING UROLITHIASIS: (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DISCIPLINE “UROLOGY”). (2025). SCIENCE TIME JOURNAL, 3(5), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v3i5.4667
Indexed & Abstracted In

Our articles are indexed and discoverable across leading academic databases worldwide