POLITENESS STRATEGIES AND POWER RELATIONS IN DETECTIVE–SUSPECT HEROES COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v3i4.4580Keywords:
politeness strategies, power relations, linguopragmatics, detective fiction, suspect speech, interrogation dialogues, speech actsAbstract
This study examines the linguistic and pragmatic mechanisms underlying communication between detectives and suspects in detective fiction. Drawing on dialogues from Arthur Conan Doyle’s works and selected contemporary detective narratives, the research identifies dominant politeness strategies, institutional power markers, speech act patterns, and interrogation tactics shaping investigative discourse. The findings reveal that detectives typically employ direct directives, presupposition-based questioning, and coercive interrogatives to assert institutional authority, while suspects rely on indirectness, avoidance, mitigation, hesitation, and self-protective pragmatic strategies to manage face-threatening situations. The study demonstrates that politeness strategies in detective–suspect communication function not only as communicative tools but also as indicators of psychological tension, hierarchical imbalance, and narrative progression. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of linguopragmatics in the structure of detective narratives.
Downloads
References
1. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
3. Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). Academic Press.
4. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
5. van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
7. Ehrlich, S. (2001). Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. Routledge.
8. Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Wiley-Blackwell.
